Blog
What Is Autism Masking and Why Does It Happen?

What Is Autism Masking and Why Does It Happen?

Defines autism masking (camouflaging), exploring the reasons autistic individuals suppress their traits and the impact it has.
April 28, 2025

Introduction

"I've been acting my whole life," confides Sarah, a 34-year-old software engineer diagnosed with autism in her late twenties. "I have a different script for work meetings, lunch with colleagues, and family gatherings. It's exhausting, but it feels necessary for survival."

Sarah is describing autism masking—a phenomenon where individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) consciously or unconsciously conceal their natural autistic behaviors and adopt neurotypical social norms to fit in. While this social camouflaging allows many autistic people to navigate a world not designed for them, it comes with significant costs to mental health and personal identity.

According to recent research, up to 70% of autistic individuals report engaging in masking behaviors [1]. Yet despite its prevalence, masking remains poorly understood by many healthcare professionals, educators, family members, and even by autistic individuals themselves, who may not recognize their own adaptive behaviors as masking.

This comprehensive guide explores what autism masking involves, why it happens, how it impacts those who practice it, and what healthier alternatives might look like for autistic individuals seeking authentic connection without sacrificing their wellbeing.

What Is Autism Masking?

Definition and Scope

Autism masking (also called camouflaging) refers to the conscious or unconscious suppression of natural autistic traits and the adoption of neurotypical behaviors to appear "normal" in social situations. It involves:

  • Suppressing autistic behaviors: Hiding stimming movements, restricting special interests, or suppressing sensory reactions
  • Mimicking neurotypical behaviors: Forcing eye contact, rehearsing facial expressions, memorizing social scripts
  • Compensatory strategies: Using intellectual analysis rather than intuition to navigate social situations
  • Identity management: Presenting different personas in different contexts

A landmark study by Hull et al. (2017) defined camouflaging as "the difference between how people seem in social contexts and what's happening to them on the inside" [2]. This gap between external presentation and internal experience is at the heart of masking.

Common Masking Strategies

Masking takes many forms, with autistic individuals often employing multiple strategies simultaneously:

Non-verbal Communication Adjustments:

  • Practicing and maintaining "appropriate" eye contact
  • Rehearsing facial expressions in mirrors
  • Manually suppressing stims like hand-flapping or rocking
  • Mimicking others' body language and gestures

Verbal Communication Management:

  • Preparing conversation scripts and responses in advance
  • Memorizing jokes or phrases that reliably get positive responses
  • Developing a "social persona" with rehearsed stories and topics
  • Carefully monitoring tone of voice and volume

Sensory Response Control:

  • Hiding reactions to overwhelming sensory input
  • Enduring painful sensory environments without complaint
  • Developing excuses to escape when sensory overload becomes unbearable
  • Using discreet sensory tools (like noise-canceling earbuds or fidget items in pockets)

Special Interest Modification:

  • Limiting discussion of special interests
  • Developing "acceptable" interests that facilitate social connection
  • Researching common interests (sports, pop culture) to have conversation material
  • Using special interests as "social currency" only when appropriate

According to a 2019 survey of 262 autistic adults, the most commonly reported masking behaviors were: forcing oneself to make eye contact (79%), rehearsing what to say in conversations (69%), and mimicking others' social behaviors (66%) [3].

Who Masks and Why?

Prevalence Across Different Groups

While masking occurs across the autism spectrum, research indicates some patterns in who is most likely to engage in camouflaging behaviors:

Gender Differences: Early research suggested masking was more common in autistic females, which partly explained why many women and girls went undiagnosed. However, recent studies show that people of all genders mask, though sometimes in different ways. A 2020 study found:

  • 80% of autistic females reported regular masking
  • 70% of autistic males reported regular masking
  • 80% of non-binary/gender-diverse autistic individuals reported masking

Age Patterns: Masking typically increases with age as social expectations become more complex:

  • Young children may mask less due to fewer social demands
  • Masking often increases dramatically during adolescence
  • Many adults report lifelong masking, with skills becoming more refined over time

Diagnostic History: Those diagnosed later in life often report extensive masking:

  • 90% of individuals diagnosed in adulthood report long-term masking
  • Many cite their effective masking as a direct reason for delayed diagnosis
  • Some develop masking so effectively they remain undiagnosed despite significant challenges

Cultural Factors: Cultural expectations significantly impact masking behaviors:

  • Individuals from collectivist cultures may experience greater pressure to conform
  • Varying cultural norms around eye contact, direct communication, and emotional expression affect what behaviors require masking
  • Racial and ethnic minorities often report "double masking"—both autism and racial/cultural identity

Motivations for Masking

Understanding why autistic people mask reveals much about the societal pressures they face. Research has identified several primary motivations:

Connection and Belonging:

  • Desire for friendship and social acceptance
  • Fear of rejection if true autistic self is revealed
  • Need for romantic relationships
  • Pursuit of "fitting in" with peer groups

Safety and Protection:

  • Avoiding bullying and victimization
  • Preventing discrimination in educational settings
  • Protecting oneself from potential predatory behavior
  • Reducing stigmatization

Professional Success:

  • Securing and maintaining employment
  • Advancing in career paths
  • Meeting workplace social expectations
  • Navigating professional networking

Practical Necessity:

  • Accessing needed services and accommodations
  • Navigating essential social systems (healthcare, education, legal)
  • Functioning in environments with no autism-friendly alternatives

A 2018 study found that 78% of autistic adults reported masking primarily "to get through required social interactions successfully," while 69% reported doing so "to avoid potential discrimination or negative treatment" [1].

The Neurological and Psychological Basis of Masking

Cognitive Mechanisms

Masking involves several distinct cognitive processes:

Social Cognition and Compensation:

  • Using explicit, rule-based reasoning to solve social problems typically handled implicitly by neurotypical individuals
  • Developing observation skills to analyze and categorize social behaviors
  • Creating decision trees and mental flowcharts for social situations
  • Compensating for differences in natural social intuition

Executive Functioning Demands:

  • Constantly monitoring one's own behavior (heavy working memory load)
  • Simultaneously tracking social rules, sensory input, and personal responses
  • Frequently switching between authentic and performed behaviors
  • Planning responses while listening to ongoing conversation

Sensory Processing Complexities:

  • Managing sensory discomfort while maintaining social performance
  • Dividing attention between internal sensory experiences and external social demands
  • Using cognitive resources to filter or suppress sensory reactions

Neuroimaging studies suggest that autistic individuals often recruit different brain regions for social tasks compared to neurotypical people, potentially reflecting these compensatory strategies. A 2019 fMRI study found that autistic adults showed increased activity in executive function regions during social tasks compared to matched neurotypical controls [4].

The High Cost of Masking

While masking may provide short-term social advantages, research increasingly reveals its substantial costs to wellbeing:

Mental Health Impact

Multiple studies have documented strong correlations between autism masking and:

Exhaustion and Burnout:

  • 92% of masking autistic adults report extreme fatigue after social engagements
  • Higher masking scores correlate with higher levels of reported burnout
  • Many describe needing extensive recovery time after masking

Anxiety and Depression:

  • Masking is associated with a 2-3 fold increase in anxiety symptoms
  • A 2020 study found masking predicted depression severity better than autism symptom severity itself
  • Social anxiety disorder is diagnosed in approximately 50% of autistic adults who regularly mask

Identity Confusion:

  • Many report feeling "like an impostor" in all contexts
  • Some describe no longer knowing which behaviors are authentic versus performed
  • Long-term masking can create profound confusion about personal identity

Suicidality:

  • Research suggests masking correlates with increased suicidal ideation
  • The cognitive dissonance of persistent masking is associated with self-hatred
  • The exhaustion from constant performance contributes to feelings of hopelessness

A 2018 study found that higher camouflaging scores were associated with increased depression (r=0.41), anxiety (r=0.45), and suicidal thoughts (r=0.39) [5].

Physical Health Consequences

The stress of constant masking creates physical health challenges:

Chronic Stress Response:

  • Elevated cortisol levels
  • Compromised immune function
  • Digestive issues
  • Sleep disturbances

Physical Manifestations:

  • Tension headaches and migraines
  • Muscle pain from sustained tension
  • Increased sensory sensitivity due to ongoing stress
  • Exacerbation of co-occurring conditions like fibromyalgia

Energy Depletion:

  • Profound fatigue described as differing from typical tiredness
  • Decreased cognitive capacity for other tasks
  • Reduced capacity for self-care activities
  • Reports of "crashing" after sustained masking periods

Developmental and Long-term Effects

Long-term masking can fundamentally alter developmental trajectories:

Delayed Diagnosis:

  • Effective masking often leads to missed or late diagnosis
  • Many individuals aren't identified until crisis points in adulthood
  • Women and girls are particularly affected, with diagnosis often delayed by 10+ years

Relationship Difficulties:

  • Difficulty forming authentic connections while masking
  • Pattern of intense, short-term relationships that end when masking becomes unsustainable
  • Development of relationships based on inauthentic presentation

Career Impacts:

  • High-functioning presentation but frequent job changes due to burnout
  • Pattern of excelling briefly followed by collapse
  • Difficulty advocating for needed accommodations due to "looking fine"

Identity Development Issues:

  • Internalized ableism and self-rejection
  • Difficulty identifying personal preferences versus socially-expected ones
  • Development of personas rather than integrated sense of self

A longitudinal study followed autistic young adults over five years and found that those reporting high levels of masking showed significantly worse mental health outcomes and lower life satisfaction compared to those who masked less, regardless of autism symptom severity.

Recognizing Masking in Different Populations

Children and Adolescents

Masking in younger populations may look different than in adults:

Early Signs in Children:

  • Being notably different when at home versus school ("Jekyll and Hyde" presentation)
  • Excessive rule-following and people-pleasing behaviors
  • Collecting and categorizing social information
  • Meltdowns or shutdowns after school in the safety of home
  • Mimicking specific peers or fictional characters

Adolescent Manifestations:

  • Intense research on social norms and trends
  • Excessive concern about fitting in
  • Adopting exaggerated personas that mask autistic traits
  • Using humor or academic achievement as social diversion
  • Profound exhaustion and need for recovery time

Parents and educators should note that a child who appears to function well socially at school may be expending enormous effort to do so, only to collapse at home where it feels safe to be authentic.

Women and Girls

Research indicates that autism often presents differently in females, with masking playing a central role:

Common Female Masking Patterns:

  • Higher social motivation and stronger desire for friendship
  • More active study of social behavior and imitation
  • Development of special interests that appear more socially acceptable (e.g., fiction, psychology, animals)
  • Creation of social scripts from books, TV, or observation
  • Using intelligence to compensate for social differences

Societal Factors:

  • Higher social expectations placed on girls
  • Greater emphasis on relational skills
  • More severe social penalties for female social mistakes
  • Gender norms that coincidentally mask some autistic traits

The result is that many autistic females develop what psychologist Dr. Tania Marshall calls "a social façade so convincing that it often goes undetected by professionals." This contributes to diagnostic ratios shifting from the often-cited 4:1 male-to-female ratio in childhood to closer to 1.8:1 in adulthood as more women self-identify and seek diagnosis.

Late-Diagnosed Adults

Adults identified later in life often have extensive masking histories:

Common Patterns:

  • Lifelong sense of being "different" without understanding why
  • History of social exhaustion and withdrawal
  • Multiple burnouts or mental health crises
  • Relief upon diagnosis followed by grief over "lost time"
  • Difficulty separating masked behaviors from authentic identity

Recognition Challenges:

  • Successful career or relationship history that obscures struggles
  • Development of explanations for autistic traits ("I'm just introverted/anxious/highly sensitive")
  • Adaptation of lifestyle to accommodate needs without understanding them
  • High intelligence used to create cognitive workarounds

The Mask Versus the Self: Ethical Considerations

The discussion of masking raises profound ethical questions about authenticity, accommodation, and societal expectations:

Neurodiversity Perspective

The neurodiversity movement frames autism not as a disorder to be cured but as a natural human variation. From this perspective:

  • Masking represents an unjust burden placed on neurominorities
  • The emphasis should be on creating accepting environments, not changing autistic people
  • Society's demand for neurotypical presentation constitutes a form of discrimination
  • Authentic autistic expression should be valued rather than suppressed

Balancing Adaptation and Authenticity

A more nuanced perspective acknowledges:

  • Some degree of social adaptation is required of everyone, neurotypical or neurodivergent
  • The issue isn't whether to adapt but the degree and cost of adaptation required
  • Certain contexts may reasonably require more conformity than others
  • The goal should be finding a sustainable balance between authenticity and adaptation

Disclosure Dilemmas

Autistic individuals face complex choices about disclosure:

  • Full disclosure may invite discrimination or stereotyping
  • Non-disclosure may prevent access to needed accommodations
  • Selective disclosure creates challenges of audience management
  • Each context presents unique risk-benefit calculations

As one autistic self-advocate noted: "I'm not hiding who I am because I'm ashamed. I'm hiding because I've learned it's often not safe to be seen."

Supporting Healthier Alternatives to Masking

For Autistic Individuals

Those who recognize their own masking behaviors can explore more sustainable approaches:

Selective Masking:

  • Identifying contexts where masking is necessary versus optional
  • Setting time limits for high-masking situations
  • Building in recovery periods after masking
  • Developing a "masking budget" that acknowledges limited capacity

Finding Middle Ground:

  • Distinguishing between harmful suppression and helpful adaptation
  • Identifying authentic self-expression that doesn't impede communication
  • Developing compensatory strategies that require less cognitive effort
  • Using assistive technologies that reduce masking demands

Building Self-Acceptance:

  • Connecting with autistic community to normalize experiences
  • Developing language to understand and describe internal experiences
  • Practicing self-compassion for both autistic traits and masking behaviors
  • Gradually experimenting with more authentic self-presentation

Disclosure Strategies:

  • Developing comfortable explanations of needs without full diagnostic disclosure
  • Identifying safe people for fuller disclosure
  • Using written or prepared explanations when helpful
  • Finding communities where less masking is required

For Parents and Families

Families can play crucial roles in reducing harmful masking:

Creating Home Sanctuaries:

  • Establishing home as a safe space for authentic expression
  • Reducing sensory stressors in the home environment
  • Validating the effort involved in masking at school/work
  • Providing decompression time after high-masking contexts

Supporting Self-Advocacy:

  • Teaching children to identify and express their needs
  • Role-playing effective communication about accommodations
  • Distinguishing between helpful social skills and harmful masking
  • Modeling self-advocacy and boundary-setting

Building Confidence:

  • Emphasizing strengths and positive autistic traits
  • Connecting children with autistic role models and mentors
  • Celebrating differences rather than just tolerating them
  • Providing language about neurodiversity and autism acceptance

For Professionals

Healthcare providers, educators, and employers can reduce masking pressures:

Recognition and Assessment:

  • Including masking behaviors in diagnostic evaluations
  • Recognizing that "high functioning" presentation may indicate masking, not absence of support needs
  • Assessing for signs of burnout and masking-related distress
  • Understanding how masking affects symptom presentation

Environmental Accommodations:

  • Creating sensory-friendly spaces
  • Providing clear, explicit expectations
  • Offering alternative communication options
  • Allowing for breaks and recovery time

Attitude and Approach:

  • Focusing on functioning and wellbeing rather than "normalcy"
  • Recognizing the expertise of autistic individuals about their own experiences
  • Distinguishing between helpful skills teaching and harmful conformity pressure
  • Promoting neurodiversity-affirming approaches

The Future of Masking Research and Support

As understanding of autism masking grows, several promising developments are emerging:

Evolving Research Focus

Current research is expanding beyond simply documenting masking to:

  • Developing validated measurement tools for masking behaviors
  • Investigating neurological correlates of masking
  • Exploring developmental trajectories of masking across the lifespan
  • Identifying subgroups who may be more vulnerable to masking-related harm

Emerging Therapeutic Approaches

New therapeutic models are being developed that specifically address masking:

  • Neurodiversity-affirming cognitive behavioral approaches
  • Burnout prevention and recovery protocols
  • Identity development work for late-diagnosed adults
  • Sensory integration approaches that reduce masking necessity

Societal and Educational Shifts

Broader cultural changes are slowly reducing masking pressure:

  • Increased media representation of authentic autistic characters
  • Workplace neurodiversity initiatives that value different cognitive styles
  • Educational approaches that accommodate diverse learning and interaction styles
  • Greater awareness of autism beyond stereotypical presentations

Conclusion: Toward a More Authentic Future

Autism masking represents a complex adaptation to a world that often fails to accommodate neurological differences. While it can provide short-term social advantages, the growing body of research makes clear that extensive masking exacts a heavy toll on mental health, identity development, and overall wellbeing.

The path forward requires a balanced approach that:

  1. Recognizes masking as a common but potentially harmful coping strategy
  2. Reduces the need for masking through environmental accommodation and increased acceptance
  3. Supports individuals in finding their own sustainable balance between adaptation and authenticity
  4. Shifts cultural expectations to value neurodiversity rather than conformity

As one autistic self-advocate eloquently stated: "The goal isn't to eliminate all adaptation—that's part of being human. The goal is to create a world where the burden of change doesn't fall so disproportionately on those who are already working the hardest just to exist in spaces not designed for them."

For autistic individuals, family members, and professionals alike, understanding masking represents a crucial step toward supporting not just better functioning, but more authentic living—where autistic people can participate in society without sacrificing their wellbeing and sense of self.

References

[1] https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-018-3792-6

[2] https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-017-3166-5

[3] https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-018-3878-1

[4]https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30224-X

[5] https://doi.org/10.1186/s13229-018-0226-4